Freematics Forum

This command does not work.

If you use it in sequence, it returns ERROR.

But even when it returns OK, VIN stills supported.

Besides that, disabling a PID doesnt make it stop responding to requests.. It shouldnt be this way.

Hi jochen,

use a serial sniffer, to see the communication between the GUI and the computer.

I used this one:
http://freeserialanalyzer.com/

Att,
Daniel.

I have already found it using a serial sniffer.

it goes like this:
000000: ATSET 0100=ff,ef,ff,ff
000001: OK

this is when i disabled Engine RPM.
For VIN is correctly documented.

Sorry, pillepallepeter, you misunderstood the question. Disable PID is different than to Clear DTC. I am not working with DTCs. I am working with Service $01 PIDs. $01 PID 0x00 is a Support PID that shows me what PID are ENABLE and the ones that i will have an answer for a PID request. I think in th...

Well, newer version from the GUI have the DISABLE PID feature. But i dont see it on the list of AT Commands.. and the GUI just use that.. So where is that documented? And.. The emulator sends on initialization that it supports all PIDs.. That is wrong. Can you correct that? Besides that.. Can we cha...

Whats the difference between this two AT Commands? Here: ATZ Function: re-initializing the emulator Response: the name and version of the emulator ATR Function: restarting the emulator Response: the name and version of the emulator But what actually is the difference? Thx. daniel.

Hi, I was testing here, and i didnt do the 5-baud Init completely and the emulator returned succcess.. Actually i did just the primary pulse for 5-Baud.. and after some time the emulator gave me the key bytes.. So.. my 5-Baud was actually wrong, and when i tried in the cars it didnt work.. So i coul...

Thanks! Already downloaded it!

Do you have meanings of updating the firmware too? found some bugs on it.. Trying to keep posting here.

Hey Stanley.. The link is broken on the website.. Could just download the firmware update..

Yes, the emulator is wrong..
I tested in one car yet (still to be tested in others), but the response was in 30ms.. Why the emulator is so wrong? Thanks.